Inês Camarinha — Online Casino Analyst

Inês Camarinha, online casino analyst and editor of gingacasino.info

Lisbon · 9 years covering iGaming · tests with her own money

About the Author: Who I Am

I am Inês Camarinha, an online casino analyst based in Lisbon and the editor of gingacasino.info. I came into this industry sideways: my first six years were spent as a business journalist covering payments and consumer finance, which is where I learned that the interesting part of any product is rarely the marketing and almost always the small print about money. Nine years ago I started applying the same habit to online casinos, and I have been doing it since — for Portuguese readers first, and on these English pages for anyone reading in English while playing from Portugal.

That background explains the tone of everything here. I am not a lawyer and not a licensed auditor, and I do not pretend to be either. I am an experienced player who documents what actually happens, with receipts.

I use the word expert carefully, because the industry throws it around. I am an expert on a narrow and testable set of things: how money moves in and out of a casino account in Portugal, how long each rail really takes, how a bonus term behaves once you do the arithmetic, and what a licence entry in a public register does and does not guarantee. On anything outside that — legal advice, tax, the internal accounts of an operator — I am not an expert and I say so on the page rather than filling the gap. That boundary is the whole point of an author page: it tells you which sentences here are measured and which are opinion.

How I Test a Casino

Every platform goes through the same routine, and it is deliberately unglamorous. I open a real account in my own name and time the registration form. I complete KYC on day one rather than waiting until money is at stake — citizen card, a utility bill under three months old, a proof of the payment method — and I log how long the review took. Then I deposit through every method the cashier offers a player in Portugal: MB WAY, Multibanco, Trustly, Skrill and Paysafecard from €20, a SEPA bank transfer from €25, USDT or Litecoin from around €50.

After that comes the part that produces the numbers you read in the reviews: a full deposit–play–withdraw cycle, timed end to end on each method, with the intervals written into a spreadsheet as they happen. Request timestamp, approval timestamp, arrival timestamp, fee if any, and whatever the cashier said while it was pending. That is where a line like "Skrill in 1–2 hours after approval" comes from — a wallet statement, not an operator help page. When a method behaves differently from its own documentation, the discrepancy goes into the text; Paysafecard, which funds an account but cannot receive a payout, is the standing example.

I also open live chat at three different hours, including the middle of the night, and time the first reply that actually answers the question rather than the first reply that arrives. And I read the bonus terms line by line, recalculating the wagering against the headline figure, because that is where most of the disappointment in this industry is manufactured.

What I Score, and How Much Each Part Counts

Payments carry the most weight because a casino that will not pay is worthless whatever else it does well. Licensing sits second because it decides who you can complain to when something goes wrong.

Three Things I Never Write

An exact certified RTP for a specific game. Studios ship several RTP configurations of the same slot and operators choose between them, so a precise figure quoted on a review page is a guess dressed as a fact. I write the honest range — typically 95–96% — and tell you to open the game's information screen.

That an operator holds a licence it does not hold. Ginga runs under an international licence, not an SRIJ one, and I say so on every page where it matters, including in a paragraph that costs the page its most flattering line.

A strategy that claims to beat the house edge. There isn't one. Systems, patterns and "hot" tables are entertainment, not method, and anyone selling otherwise is selling something.

Independence and How This Site Is Funded

gingacasino.info is independent of the casinos it covers. Coverage is not for sale, no operator sees a review before it publishes, and no commission arrangement has ever moved a score. Some links here are affiliate links, which is how the research is paid for, and the whole arrangement is set out plainly on our affiliate disclosure page. The practical proof is in the text: the weak points I find stay in the review, and you can read the current ones in the Ginga review.

Corrections and Contact

If something on these pages is wrong, I want to know. Send the URL and the sentence you are disputing through the contact page; corrections go to the front of the queue, a confirmed error is normally fixed within 48 hours, and the page carries a revision note afterwards. I would rather publish a correction than leave a figure standing that somebody might act on.

On Playing Responsibly

Gambling is entertainment with a negative expected value, and it belongs in the same budget line as a concert ticket rather than in the income column. Everything I write is for adults aged 18 and over, and I set a deposit limit on every test account before the first payment — not as a gesture, but because it is genuinely the one control that changes outcomes. If it stops being fun, help in Portugal is free and confidential: SICAD publishes guidance and Linha Vida 1414 answers calls. The tools and how they work are described on our responsible gambling page.

Play Now